Differentiated integration and role conceptions in multilateral security orders: A comparative study of France, Germany, Ireland and Romania

Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningfagfællebedømt

Standard

Differentiated integration and role conceptions in multilateral security orders : A comparative study of France, Germany, Ireland and Romania. / Nele Marianne Ewers-Peters.

I: Defence Studies, Bind 22, Nr. 4, 2022, s. 666-688.

Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningfagfællebedømt

Harvard

Nele Marianne Ewers-Peters 2022, 'Differentiated integration and role conceptions in multilateral security orders: A comparative study of France, Germany, Ireland and Romania', Defence Studies, bind 22, nr. 4, s. 666-688. https://doi.org/10.1080/14702436.2022.2110475

APA

Nele Marianne Ewers-Peters (2022). Differentiated integration and role conceptions in multilateral security orders: A comparative study of France, Germany, Ireland and Romania. Defence Studies, 22(4), 666-688. https://doi.org/10.1080/14702436.2022.2110475

Vancouver

Nele Marianne Ewers-Peters. Differentiated integration and role conceptions in multilateral security orders: A comparative study of France, Germany, Ireland and Romania. Defence Studies. 2022;22(4):666-688. https://doi.org/10.1080/14702436.2022.2110475

Author

Nele Marianne Ewers-Peters. / Differentiated integration and role conceptions in multilateral security orders : A comparative study of France, Germany, Ireland and Romania. I: Defence Studies. 2022 ; Bind 22, Nr. 4. s. 666-688.

Bibtex

@article{029ad7a9522a4061b2f5cdbd45e0a5b8,
title = "Differentiated integration and role conceptions in multilateral security orders: A comparative study of France, Germany, Ireland and Romania",
abstract = "An extensive size of literature has investigated the multifaceted dimensions of differentiated integration in Europe. Notwithstanding, we know little about the drivers and strategic underpinnings of differentiated integration in the high politics areas concerning national and international security, such as foreign policy, security and defence. What explains the variation in states{\textquoteright} foreign policy preferences of integration in multilateral security orders? In this article, we seek to explain this variation by putting forward a two-level argument. First, we claim that states adopt a genuine role player conception underpinned by a mixture of relative gains, absolute gains, and normative factors. Second, we propose a novel operational model to examine member states{\textquoteright} efforts for cooperation and integration in the security and defence domain based on their threat perceptions, level of ambitions, strategic partnerships, military spending, and troop deployments. To illustrate our argument, we employ a comparative case study design, examining four countries: Germany, France, Ireland and Romania. The article finds that the analysed countries play conspicuous roles in the Euro-Atlantic security order. France takes the role of an agile power-projector, Germany embraces the role of a global responsibility taker, Ireland plays the role of a peacekeeping neutral, and Romania of a small regional power.",
author = "{Nele Marianne Ewers-Peters} and Cornelia Baciu",
year = "2022",
doi = "10.1080/14702436.2022.2110475",
language = "English",
volume = "22",
pages = "666--688",
journal = "Defence Studies",
issn = "1470-2436",
publisher = "Routledge",
number = "4",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Differentiated integration and role conceptions in multilateral security orders

T2 - A comparative study of France, Germany, Ireland and Romania

AU - Nele Marianne Ewers-Peters

AU - Baciu, Cornelia

PY - 2022

Y1 - 2022

N2 - An extensive size of literature has investigated the multifaceted dimensions of differentiated integration in Europe. Notwithstanding, we know little about the drivers and strategic underpinnings of differentiated integration in the high politics areas concerning national and international security, such as foreign policy, security and defence. What explains the variation in states’ foreign policy preferences of integration in multilateral security orders? In this article, we seek to explain this variation by putting forward a two-level argument. First, we claim that states adopt a genuine role player conception underpinned by a mixture of relative gains, absolute gains, and normative factors. Second, we propose a novel operational model to examine member states’ efforts for cooperation and integration in the security and defence domain based on their threat perceptions, level of ambitions, strategic partnerships, military spending, and troop deployments. To illustrate our argument, we employ a comparative case study design, examining four countries: Germany, France, Ireland and Romania. The article finds that the analysed countries play conspicuous roles in the Euro-Atlantic security order. France takes the role of an agile power-projector, Germany embraces the role of a global responsibility taker, Ireland plays the role of a peacekeeping neutral, and Romania of a small regional power.

AB - An extensive size of literature has investigated the multifaceted dimensions of differentiated integration in Europe. Notwithstanding, we know little about the drivers and strategic underpinnings of differentiated integration in the high politics areas concerning national and international security, such as foreign policy, security and defence. What explains the variation in states’ foreign policy preferences of integration in multilateral security orders? In this article, we seek to explain this variation by putting forward a two-level argument. First, we claim that states adopt a genuine role player conception underpinned by a mixture of relative gains, absolute gains, and normative factors. Second, we propose a novel operational model to examine member states’ efforts for cooperation and integration in the security and defence domain based on their threat perceptions, level of ambitions, strategic partnerships, military spending, and troop deployments. To illustrate our argument, we employ a comparative case study design, examining four countries: Germany, France, Ireland and Romania. The article finds that the analysed countries play conspicuous roles in the Euro-Atlantic security order. France takes the role of an agile power-projector, Germany embraces the role of a global responsibility taker, Ireland plays the role of a peacekeeping neutral, and Romania of a small regional power.

U2 - 10.1080/14702436.2022.2110475

DO - 10.1080/14702436.2022.2110475

M3 - Journal article

VL - 22

SP - 666

EP - 688

JO - Defence Studies

JF - Defence Studies

SN - 1470-2436

IS - 4

ER -

ID: 321012830