Biometric voter registration: A new modality of democracy assistance

Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningfagfællebedømt

Standard

Biometric voter registration : A new modality of democracy assistance. / Jacobsen, Katja Lindskov.

I: Cooperation & Conflict, Bind 55, Nr. 1, 2019, s. 127-148.

Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningfagfællebedømt

Harvard

Jacobsen, KL 2019, 'Biometric voter registration: A new modality of democracy assistance', Cooperation & Conflict, bind 55, nr. 1, s. 127-148. https://doi.org/10.1177/0010836719850219

APA

Jacobsen, K. L. (2019). Biometric voter registration: A new modality of democracy assistance. Cooperation & Conflict, 55(1), 127-148. https://doi.org/10.1177/0010836719850219

Vancouver

Jacobsen KL. Biometric voter registration: A new modality of democracy assistance. Cooperation & Conflict. 2019;55(1):127-148. https://doi.org/10.1177/0010836719850219

Author

Jacobsen, Katja Lindskov. / Biometric voter registration : A new modality of democracy assistance. I: Cooperation & Conflict. 2019 ; Bind 55, Nr. 1. s. 127-148.

Bibtex

@article{89291019238e42cda9c5f6cb1696b09a,
title = "Biometric voter registration: A new modality of democracy assistance",
abstract = "It has been argued that we are witnessing a retreat from democracy promotion in liberal interventionism. Focusing on the roll-out of biometric voter registration (BVR) across Africa, as supported by institutions such as the United Nations Development Programme, this article suggests that rather than a retreat we are seeing the emergence of a new and seemingly lighter approach to liberal democracy promotion. Through an analysis of the use of BVR in Kenyan elections, the article illustrates some key implications of this development. At the local level, the framing of BVR as a {\textquoteleft}solution{\textquoteright} omits important challenges to democratic elections in Kenya. At the global level, the roll-out of BVR reinforces unequal global power structures, for example by constituting an increasing number of African states as laboratories for the trialling of a technology which, due to fears of hacking, has now been rolled back in the US. To make this argument, the article combines insights from recent debates about the state of liberal interventionism, with insights from Michel Foucault and Sheila Jasanoff about the politics of technology.",
author = "Jacobsen, {Katja Lindskov}",
year = "2019",
doi = "10.1177/0010836719850219",
language = "English",
volume = "55",
pages = "127--148",
journal = "Cooperation and Conflict",
issn = "0010-8367",
publisher = "SAGE Publications",
number = "1",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Biometric voter registration

T2 - A new modality of democracy assistance

AU - Jacobsen, Katja Lindskov

PY - 2019

Y1 - 2019

N2 - It has been argued that we are witnessing a retreat from democracy promotion in liberal interventionism. Focusing on the roll-out of biometric voter registration (BVR) across Africa, as supported by institutions such as the United Nations Development Programme, this article suggests that rather than a retreat we are seeing the emergence of a new and seemingly lighter approach to liberal democracy promotion. Through an analysis of the use of BVR in Kenyan elections, the article illustrates some key implications of this development. At the local level, the framing of BVR as a ‘solution’ omits important challenges to democratic elections in Kenya. At the global level, the roll-out of BVR reinforces unequal global power structures, for example by constituting an increasing number of African states as laboratories for the trialling of a technology which, due to fears of hacking, has now been rolled back in the US. To make this argument, the article combines insights from recent debates about the state of liberal interventionism, with insights from Michel Foucault and Sheila Jasanoff about the politics of technology.

AB - It has been argued that we are witnessing a retreat from democracy promotion in liberal interventionism. Focusing on the roll-out of biometric voter registration (BVR) across Africa, as supported by institutions such as the United Nations Development Programme, this article suggests that rather than a retreat we are seeing the emergence of a new and seemingly lighter approach to liberal democracy promotion. Through an analysis of the use of BVR in Kenyan elections, the article illustrates some key implications of this development. At the local level, the framing of BVR as a ‘solution’ omits important challenges to democratic elections in Kenya. At the global level, the roll-out of BVR reinforces unequal global power structures, for example by constituting an increasing number of African states as laboratories for the trialling of a technology which, due to fears of hacking, has now been rolled back in the US. To make this argument, the article combines insights from recent debates about the state of liberal interventionism, with insights from Michel Foucault and Sheila Jasanoff about the politics of technology.

U2 - 10.1177/0010836719850219

DO - 10.1177/0010836719850219

M3 - Journal article

VL - 55

SP - 127

EP - 148

JO - Cooperation and Conflict

JF - Cooperation and Conflict

SN - 0010-8367

IS - 1

ER -

ID: 232068393