Usability Testing: Too Early? Too Much Talking? Too Many Problems?
Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskrift › Tidsskriftartikel › Forskning › fagfællebedømt
Standard
Usability Testing: Too Early? Too Much Talking? Too Many Problems? / Hertzum, Morten.
I: Journal of Usability Studies, Bind 11, Nr. 3, 2016, s. 83-88.Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskrift › Tidsskriftartikel › Forskning › fagfællebedømt
Harvard
APA
Vancouver
Author
Bibtex
}
RIS
TY - JOUR
T1 - Usability Testing: Too Early? Too Much Talking? Too Many Problems?
AU - Hertzum, Morten
PY - 2016
Y1 - 2016
N2 - Usability testing has evolved in response to a search for tests that are cheap, early, easy, and fast. In addition, it accords with a situational definition of usability, such as the one propounded by ISO. By approaching usability from an organizational perspective, this author argues that usability should (also) be evaluated late, that usability professionals should be wary of thinking aloud, and that they should focus more on effects achievement than problem detection.
AB - Usability testing has evolved in response to a search for tests that are cheap, early, easy, and fast. In addition, it accords with a situational definition of usability, such as the one propounded by ISO. By approaching usability from an organizational perspective, this author argues that usability should (also) be evaluated late, that usability professionals should be wary of thinking aloud, and that they should focus more on effects achievement than problem detection.
KW - Faculty of Humanities
KW - usability evaluation
UR - http://uxpajournal.org/usability-testing-early-talking-problems/
M3 - Journal article
VL - 11
SP - 83
EP - 88
JO - Journal of Usability Studies
JF - Journal of Usability Studies
SN - 1931-3357
IS - 3
ER -
ID: 161634481